Suite Dashboard

Select a module to launch.

🚀
New to ASCENTRA™?
Follow our recommended 5-step workflow: Assessment → Specifications → Market Data → CBA Analysis → Governance
Data Flow · How Modules Connect
M01–04
Assessment
M05
Spec Writer
M07
Market Intel
M08
Governance
Reports
Deliverables
|
M06
MOU/CBA
↗ feeds M08
Active Modules?The total number of diagnostic and production tool modules available in your ASCENTRA™ suite. Each module addresses a different aspect of HR and compensation management.
8+
Assessment & Production Tools
Diagnostic Dimensions
300+
Across All Modules
Audience Modes
5
Standard · HR · Finance · Board · Union
AI Narrative Engine
Enabled
Auto-generates on every report
Assessment Modules
Module 01
Organizational Effectiveness Assessment
OET · 9-Domain Strategic Performance Diagnostic

Evaluates organizational capability across Strategic Alignment, Leadership & Governance, Workforce Architecture, Operational Systems, Culture & Engagement, Risk & Compliance, Financial Accountability, Digital Enablement, and Transformation Readiness.

ReportsDashboard
9 Domains
OEII Composite Index
Launch
Module 02
HR Effectiveness Assessment
HREA · 6-Domain HR Function Diagnostic

Assesses HR department capability across Compliance & Regulatory Alignment, Governance & Documentation, Service Delivery, Talent Lifecycle, Technology & Automation Readiness, and HR Capacity & Scalability.

ReportsDashboard
6 Domains
HROII Composite Index
Launch
Module 03
Compensation Evaluation Tool
CET · 7-Domain Total Rewards Diagnostic

Evaluates compensation system maturity across Position Architecture, Compensable Factors, Market Comparison, Internal Equity, Total Compensation Design, Institutional Readiness, and Governance & Systems.

ReportsM07 MarketM08 Governance
7 Domains
CHI Composite Index
Launch
Module 04
Workforce Strategy & HR Transformation
WSHTA · 12-Domain Workforce Diagnostic

Most comprehensive module — assesses workforce strategy maturity across 12 domains spanning Strategic Alignment, Workforce Planning, HR Operating Model, Talent Acquisition, Performance, L&D, Compensation, Leadership, Culture, and HR Technology.

ReportsDashboard
12 Domains
WHI Composite Index
Launch
Production Tools
Module 05
AI Spec Writer
SPECAI · Classification Specification Generator

Transforms legacy JDs and PDQs into standardized, compliant class specifications with AI-powered quality scoring across 6 analysis engines.

ReportsJob Evaluation
6 Engines
SQI Score
Launch
Module 06
MOU / CBA Analyzer
MOUAI · Collective Bargaining Intelligence

Upload any MOU or CBA and extract all compensation provisions into structured, comparable tables with fiscal impact analysis.

ReportsFiscal Simulator
8 Categories
Provision Map
Launch
Module 07
Market Intelligence Engine
MIBE · Compensation Data Pipeline

Automated public-sector salary intelligence. BLS OEWS, public salary schedules, peer group builder, and market position analysis.

Equity OverlayReportsM08 Governance
3 Pipelines
MPI Score
Launch
Module 08
Compensation Governance Engine
CGE · Continuous Compensation Analytics

Replaces the traditional 3–5 year study cycle. Job evaluation, market monitoring, compression detection, fiscal simulation, salary structure builder, and reclassification workflows.

ReportsSalary StructureDashboard
6 Engines
CGI Health Score
Launch
Shared Capabilities
AI Narrative Engine
Multi-Audience Reports
PDF Export
Scenario Modeling
Peer Benchmarking
Spec Generation
MOU Intelligence
BLS Data Pipeline
Comp Governance
← Suite Home

Organizational Effectiveness Assessment

Module 01 · OET · Rate each dimension (1-5) then click Generate Report for a composite OEII score with AI narrative

Rate each dimension on a 1-5 scale using the rubric descriptors provided. Consider current state, not aspirational targets.

1
Critical
2
Developing
3
Adequate
4
Strong
5
Exemplary
Strategic Alignment2.7/5.0
1. Clear strategic plan communicated to all levels
2/5
2. Organizational goals cascade to department objectives
4/5
3. Performance metrics tied to strategic outcomes
2/5
Leadership & Governance4.3/5.0
1. Defined governance structure with clear authority
5/5
2. Board/Council engaged in strategic oversight
3/5
3. Leadership succession planning in place
5/5
Workforce Architecture5.0/5.0
1. Classification system reflects actual work performed
5/5
2. Spans of control appropriate across organization
5/5
3. Organizational structure supports service delivery
5/5
Operational Systems5.0/5.0
1. Standard operating procedures documented
5/5
2. Cross-department coordination mechanisms exist
5/5
3. Service delivery metrics tracked and reported
5/5
Culture & Engagement5.0/5.0
1. Employee engagement regularly measured
5/5
2. Recognition programs aligned with values
5/5
3. Diversity, equity and inclusion actively promoted
5/5
Risk & Compliance5.0/5.0
1. Risk management framework in place
5/5
2. Regulatory compliance monitored proactively
5/5
3. Internal controls reviewed annually
5/5
Financial Accountability3.0/5.0
1. Budget aligned with strategic priorities
3/5
2. Cost allocation methodology transparent
3/5
3. Financial reporting timely and accurate
3/5
Digital Enablement3.7/5.0
1. Technology roadmap exists and funded
3/5
2. Systems integrated across departments
3/5
3. Data-driven decision making promoted
5/5
Transformation Readiness5.0/5.0
1. Change management capability demonstrated
5/5
2. Innovation encouraged and resourced
5/5
3. Continuous improvement culture established
5/5
← Suite Home

HR Effectiveness Assessment

Module 02 · HREA · Rate each dimension (1-5) then click Generate Report for a composite HROII score with AI narrative

Rate each dimension on a 1-5 scale using the rubric descriptors provided. Consider current state, not aspirational targets.

1
Critical
2
Developing
3
Adequate
4
Strong
5
Exemplary
Compliance & Regulatory4.0/5.0
1. Labor law compliance monitored systematically
4/5
2. EEO/AA plans current and reported
4/5
3. FLSA audit completed within last 2 years
4/5
4. Personnel files meet retention requirements
4/5
Governance & Documentation4.0/5.0
1. Personnel policies reviewed within 2 years
4/5
2. Classification plan formally adopted
4/5
3. Compensation philosophy documented
4/5
4. Delegation of authority clearly defined
4/5
Service Delivery & Experience3.5/5.0
1. HR service standards defined and measured
3/5
2. Employee self-service portal available
3/5
3. Onboarding process standardized
4/5
4. Exit interview data analyzed and acted on
4/5
Talent Lifecycle3.3/5.0
1. Recruitment cycle time tracked
3/5
2. Performance management system consistent
4/5
3. Training needs assessment conducted
3/5
4. Succession planning for critical roles
3/5
Technology & Automation3.0/5.0
1. HRIS supports core HR functions
3/5
2. Applicant tracking system in place
3/5
3. Time & attendance automated
3/5
4. HR analytics/reporting capability exists
3/5
HR Capacity & Scalability3.0/5.0
1. HR-to-employee ratio appropriate
3/5
2. HR staff development plan exists
3/5
3. Workload distribution balanced
3/5
4. Scalable processes for organizational growth
3/5
← Suite Home

Compensation Evaluation Tool

Module 03 · CET · Rate each dimension (1-5) then click Generate Report for a Compensation Health Index with AI narrative

Rate each dimension on a 1-5 scale using the rubric descriptors provided. Consider current state, not aspirational targets.

1
Critical
2
Developing
3
Adequate
4
Strong
5
Exemplary
Position Architecture3.0/5.0
1. Classification plan current and comprehensive
4/5
2. Job families logically organized
4/5
3. Class specifications updated within 3 years
2/5
4. Career ladders clearly defined
2/5
Compensable Factors3.0/5.0
1. Job evaluation methodology documented
3/5
2. Factor weighting defensible and consistent
3/5
3. Internal hierarchy reflects work complexity
3/5
4. Point factor or ranking system validated
3/5
Market Comparison3.3/5.0
1. Peer group methodology documented
3/5
2. Salary survey data current (within 18 months)
3/5
3. Market position policy adopted
3/5
4. Geographic differentials considered
4/5
Internal Equity2.5/5.0
1. Pay compression identified and monitored
3/5
2. Gender/race pay equity analyzed
2/5
3. Step placement criteria consistent
2/5
4. Promotional increase policy standardized
3/5
Total Compensation Design3.0/5.0
1. Salary structure range spread appropriate
3/5
2. Benefits competitiveness assessed
3/5
3. Deferred compensation options available
3/5
4. Total rewards statement provided to employees
3/5
Institutional Readiness2.8/5.0
1. Implementation funding identified
3/5
2. Stakeholder communication plan developed
2/5
3. Union/association impact assessed
3/5
4. Board/Council briefed on methodology
3/5
Governance & Systems3.0/5.0
1. Compensation administration guidelines exist
3/5
2. HRIS supports pay plan management
3/5
3. Annual salary survey participation
3/5
4. Compensation committee or review process active
3/5
← Suite Home

Workforce Strategy & HR Transformation

Module 04 · WSHTA · Rate each dimension (1-5) then click Generate Report for a WHI score with AI narrative

Rate each dimension on a 1-5 scale using the rubric descriptors provided. Consider current state, not aspirational targets.

1
Critical
2
Developing
3
Adequate
4
Strong
5
Exemplary
Strategic Alignment4.0/5.0
1. Workforce plan tied to strategic goals
4/5
2. HR priorities reflect organizational needs
4/5
Workforce Planning & Analytics3.0/5.0
1. Workforce demographics analyzed
3/5
2. Retirement risk projections current
3/5
3. Turnover root causes identified
3/5
HR Operating Model2.7/5.0
1. HR service delivery model defined
3/5
2. Shared services / COE structure evaluated
3/5
3. HR business partner model considered
2/5
Talent Acquisition2.7/5.0
1. Time-to-fill tracked by classification
3/5
2. Sourcing strategy diversified
3/5
3. Employer brand actively managed
2/5
Performance & Accountability3.0/5.0
1. Performance system aligned with goals
3/5
2. Underperformance addressed consistently
3/5
3. High performers recognized and retained
3/5
Learning & Development3.7/5.0
1. Training needs assessment current
3/5
2. Supervisory development program exists
4/5
3. Tuition reimbursement/education incentives
4/5
Compensation Strategy4.0/5.0
1. Market competitiveness assessed regularly
4/5
2. Total rewards philosophy documented
4/5
3. Pay equity monitoring ongoing
4/5
Benefits & Wellbeing3.0/5.0
1. Benefits benchmarked against peers
2/5
2. Employee wellness program active
3/5
3. Mental health resources available
4/5
Leadership & Succession3.3/5.0
1. Leadership competency model defined
4/5
2. Succession plans for critical positions
3/5
3. Emerging leader development pipeline
3/5
Culture & Engagement3.0/5.0
1. Engagement survey conducted regularly
2/5
2. DEI strategy with measurable goals
4/5
3. Values integrated into operations
3/5
Employee Relations3.7/5.0
1. Grievance process fair and timely
4/5
2. Labor relations strategy proactive
3/5
3. Workplace investigation protocols current
4/5
HR Technology3.0/5.0
1. HRIS modernization roadmap exists
3/5
2. Self-service adoption rate adequate
3/5
3. Analytics capability supports decisions
3/5
← Suite Home

AI Spec Writer & Scoring Engine

Module 05 · SPECAI · Paste a legacy JD or PDQ to generate a scored, compliant classification specification v3.0

Input — Legacy JD / PDQ

Select from the library, paste, or upload a job description

⚠ WARNINGEquity & Inclusion
5 bias/exclusionary term(s) detected. Review each finding and replace with the inclusive alternative.
Found TermLineInclusive Alternative
"preferred"L45"desired" or "strongly valued" — "preferred" can imply a narrow candidate profile
"preferred"L46"desired" or "strongly valued" — "preferred" can imply a narrow candidate profile
"bondable"L46Remove or replace with specific background check requirement — "bondable" disproportionately screens out candidates with minor records
"his/her"L33"their" or "the incumbent's" — use gender-neutral possessives
"manpower"L35"staffing," "workforce," or "personnel"
Best Practice: Public-sector classification specs should use gender-neutral, ability-focused language that complies with Title VII, ADA, ADEA, and EEOC guidelines. Avoid terms that reference protected classes, imply age/gender preferences, or create unnecessary barriers to applicants with disabilities.
✓ PASSOriginality
No boilerplate or cliché phrases detected. Specification uses position-specific language.
✓ PASSFLSA Compliance
FLSA reference found: "FLSA", "Exempt". Verify exemption classification is correctly applied against the applicable FLSA duties test.
⚠ WARNINGADA / Physical Demands
2 physical demand term(s) detected: physical demand stoop
ADA Compliance Check: Each physical demand must be (1) tied to a specific essential function, (2) stated as frequency-qualified (e.g., "occasionally lifts up to 50 lbs"), and (3) subject to reasonable accommodation. Physical demands that are not essential functions must be removed or noted as marginal. Include the statement: "Reasonable accommodations may be made to enable individuals with disabilities to perform the essential functions."
✓ PASSStructure — Duties
13 duty statements identified. Verify each begins with an action verb and describes an observable work product.
✓ PASSEducation
Education qualifications identified. Verify degree requirements are defensible and include equivalent-experience alternatives where possible.
✓ PASSKSA Section
6 KSA items identified.
✓ PASSClass Summary
Summary statement identified.
✓ PASSCertifications
Certification requirements detected. Verify certifications are "required" vs "desirable" and that timelines for post-hire acquisition are documented.
✓ PASSSpec Generated
Classification spec generated. Review all sections before adoption.
← Suite Home

MOU / CBA Compensation Analyzer

Module 06 · MOUAI · Upload a Memorandum of Understanding to extract all compensation provisions

Upload MOU / CBA Document

Drag & drop a PDF, DOCX, or text file — or click to browse
Click here to load a sample MOU for demonstration

← Suite Home

Market Intelligence & Benchmarking Engine

Module 07 · MIBE v2.1 · Blended SOC benchmarking, peer group builder, equity overlay, survey data import Engine Ready ✓

SOC Codes
56+
Crosswalk Titles
138
BLS Regions
5 + Nat'l
States + DC
51
Categories
25
Gap-to-Market Analysis
Current Midpoint
$77,000
Town of Maynard
Adjusted Composite Median
$99,194
Weighted BLS + Tier
Peer Avg Midpoint
$91,433
5 peers
Gap to Market
+28.8%
$22,194 below median
Percentile Position
25th–50th
vs adjusted composite
Gap to Peers
+18.7%
$14,433 below
Current Mid
$77,000
Adj 25th
$71,794
Peer Average
$91,433
Adj Median
$99,194
Adj 75th
$128,068
Adj 90th
$139,560
Cost-to-Target Scenarios
TargetTarget MidCurrent MidGap ($)Gap (%)Assessment
25th Percentile$71,794$77,000 −$5,206 -6.8% At/Above Target
Peer Average$91,433$77,000 +$14,433 +18.7% Critical Gap
50th (Median)$99,194$77,000 +$22,194 +28.8% Critical Gap
75th Percentile$128,068$77,000 +$51,068 +66.3% Critical Gap
← Suite Home

Compensation Governance Engine

Module 08 · CGE · Continuous compensation governance with 5 integrated engines v3.0 · AI-Powered

Internal Equity
?Are similar jobs paid fairly relative to each other?Internal equity measures whether similar jobs within your organization are paid consistently. A score below 70 suggests classification or pay structure misalignment that could create legal or morale risk.
Run Job Eval Engine
Market Position
10 Alerts?How do your salaries compare to what others pay?Market position compares your salaries against external benchmarks (BLS data, peer surveys). Alerts fire when positions fall more than 10% below the market median.
Run Market Monitor
Compression Risk
4 High?Are supervisors paid enough more than the people they manage?Compression risk identifies cases where a supervisor earns less than 5% more than their direct reports. This erodes incentive for promotion and creates retention risk at the supervisory level.
Run Detection Engine
Fiscal Impact
$4.3M?What will recommended pay changes cost your budget?The total projected fiscal impact of recommended salary adjustments including COLA, market corrections, compression fixes, and reclassifications over the modeled time period.
Run Simulator
Reclass Queue
3 Pending
Pending Requests
1
Download Template
Pre-formatted Excel template with instructions, sample data, and field validations
Includes: Instructions Tab · 3 Sample Rows · All Required Fields
2
Upload Your Data
Upload your completed template or any CSV/Excel file with classification data

Drop CSV or Excel file here — or click to browse

Accepts .csv, .xlsx, .xls · Max 500 positions

3
Quick Paste
Copy rows from Excel and paste below — tab-separated columns detected automatically
Expected columns: Job Title, Department, Job Family, Grade, Duties (tab-separated)
File Loaded: ASCENTRA_Job_Eval_Sample_3.xlsx → Classification Data
Detected 20 positions across 11 columns · Auto-mapped 10/11 fields
Column Mapping
Job Title *
Department *
Job Family
Current Grade
Duties
Skill (1-5)
Decision (1-5)
Supervisory (1-5)
Impact (1-5)
Conditions (1-5)
Budget (0-5)
Data Preview (first 5 of 20)
Job TitleDepartmentJob FamilyCurrent GradeDuties SummarySkill Level (1-5)Decision Authority (1-5)Supervisory Responsibility (1-5)Operational Impact (1-5)Working Conditions (1-5)Budget Authority (0-5)
City ManagerAdministrationExecutive32Chief administrative officer. Implements…555515
Assistant City ManagerAdministrationExecutive29Assists City Manager with daily operatio…554515
Finance DirectorFinanceExecutive27Directs all financial operations includi…554515
Public Works DirectorPublic WorksExecutive27Directs public works operations includin…555535
Police ChiefPoliceExecutive30Commands police department of 52 sworn a…555545
… and 15 more rows

Evaluation Results

Points, grade recommendation & internal equity

Complete the form and click
"Evaluate Position"

Or load positions via the
Load Data tab

Market Competitiveness Monitor
🧠Executive NarrativeASCENTRA Engine

Market competitiveness analysis for the Northeast region identified 10 classification(s) falling below competitive market thresholds, while 0 classification(s) remain within the competitive range. Below-market positions represent recruitment and retention risk that should be addressed through targeted market adjustments.

Recommendation: Prioritize market alignment for classifications with gaps exceeding 10%. Incorporate market adjustment costs into the fiscal simulation to model budget impact. Repeat market scans quarterly to track movement.

Competitive
0/10
Within ±2% of market
Above Market
0
> +5% above median
Slightly Below
0
-2% to -5%
Below Market
0
-5% to -10%
Critical
10
> -10% below median
⚠ Market Alerts — Northeast · 10 Classifications Below Competitive Threshold
CRITICAL · IT Manager — -23.1% vs Market
Current: $98,000 · Market Median (Northeast): $127,440 · Annual Gap: $29,440 · SOC 11-3021
CRITICAL · Engineering Manager — -21.6% vs Market
Current: $105,000 · Market Median (Northeast): $133,920 · Annual Gap: $28,920 · SOC 11-9041
CRITICAL · Planner II — -20.7% vs Market
Current: $62,000 · Market Median (Northeast): $78,192 · Annual Gap: $16,192 · SOC 19-3051
CRITICAL · Budget Analyst — -18.7% vs Market
Current: $72,000 · Market Median (Northeast): $88,560 · Annual Gap: $16,560 · SOC 13-2031
CRITICAL · Admin Assistant II — -15.8% vs Market
Current: $42,000 · Market Median (Northeast): $49,896 · Annual Gap: $7,896 · SOC 43-6014
CRITICAL · Maintenance Worker — -15.5% vs Market
Current: $46,000 · Market Median (Northeast): $54,432 · Annual Gap: $8,432 · SOC 49-9071
CRITICAL · Fire Captain — -14.7% vs Market
Current: $94,000 · Market Median (Northeast): $110,160 · Annual Gap: $16,160 · SOC 33-1021
CRITICAL · Finance Director — -13.7% vs Market
Current: $138,000 · Market Median (Northeast): $159,840 · Annual Gap: $21,840 · SOC 11-3031
CRITICAL · HR Director — -12.3% vs Market
Current: $125,000 · Market Median (Northeast): $142,560 · Annual Gap: $17,560 · SOC 11-3121
CRITICAL · Police Officer — -10.9% vs Market
Current: $72,000 · Market Median (Northeast): $80,784 · Annual Gap: $8,784 · SOC 33-3051
Market Competitiveness — Northeast Region
ClassificationSOCCurrent SalaryMarket MedianDeltaStatus
IT Manager11-3021$98,000$127,440-23.1%Critical
Engineering Manager11-9041$105,000$133,920-21.6%Critical
Planner II19-3051$62,000$78,192-20.7%Critical
Budget Analyst13-2031$72,000$88,560-18.7%Critical
Admin Assistant II43-6014$42,000$49,896-15.8%Critical
Maintenance Worker49-9071$46,000$54,432-15.5%Critical
Fire Captain33-1021$94,000$110,160-14.7%Critical
Finance Director11-3031$138,000$159,840-13.7%Critical
HR Director11-3121$125,000$142,560-12.3%Critical
Police Officer33-3051$72,000$80,784-10.9%Critical
Cost-to-Cure Estimate$171,784
Annual salary adjustment required to bring 10 below-market classifications to the Northeast market median. Does not include benefits load (typically 28–35% additional). A phased approach over 2–3 fiscal years is recommended to manage budget impact.
🧠Market Analysis Narrative

The organization's compensation structure is significantly below market relative to Northeast peer medians. 10 of 10 benchmarked classifications fall more than 5% below market, including 10 at critical levels (>10% gap). The most significant gap is IT Manager at -23.1% ($29,440 annual shortfall). The estimated cost-to-cure for all below-market classifications is $171,784 in base salary adjustments. A phased market alignment strategy is recommended, prioritizing classifications with the largest gaps to reduce turnover risk. Present cost-to-cure data to the governing body as part of the annual budget development process.

Compression Detection Engine

Click "Detect Compression" to analyze
supervisor-subordinate and tenure-based compression risks

Fiscal Impact Simulator
Model payroll scenarios: COLA increases, grade adjustments, compression corrections, market alignment

Adjust scenario parameters above and click
"Run Simulation"

Salary Structure Builder
Build an interactive grade-step salary table with adjustable parameters

Set your parameters and click
"Generate Structure"
to build the grade-step salary table

Reclassification Decision Engine
Submit and evaluate job reclassification requests through a 6-step workflow
1
Submit
2
Duty Analysis
3
Eval Scoring
4
Peer Comparison
5
Market Check
6
Recommendation
Reclassification Queue · 3 Requests
IDEmployeeCurrent → RequestedDepartmentSubmittedScoreStatusAction
RC-2026-001Martinez, J.Planner II → Senior PlannerCommunity Dev2026-01-15340Under Review
RC-2026-002Chen, L.IT Specialist → Sr IT SpecialistInformation Tech2026-02-03Pending Eval
RC-2026-003Williams, D.Maint Worker II → Maint Worker IIIPublic Works2026-02-20285Recommended
M03 CHI ✓ 2.9
M07 BLS ✓
Compensation Governance Health Index
Composite score across all active engines · Updated in real time
38
At Risk
Market Position0%
At Risk
Compression Risk20%
At Risk
Fiscal Planning100%
Strong
Reclass Mgmt33%
At Risk
Engine Status Matrix
Module 03 · Compensation Health Index
CHI Composite: 2.93/5.0Synced from Assessment Module
Position Architecture
3.0
Compensable Factors
3.0
Market Comparison
3.3
Internal Equity
2.5
Total Compensation Design
3.0
Institutional Readiness
2.8
Governance & Systems
3.0
Job EvaluationInactive
Not run
Evaluate positions to assess classification accuracy
📡
Market MonitorActive
10 alerts · 0 competitive
Region: Northeast · Scanned 3/16/2026
Compression DetectionActive
4 high risk · 1 moderate
8 relationships analyzed · Est. correction: $53,000
💰
Fiscal SimulatorActive
$4.31M projected
3-year projection · Modeled 3/14/2026
📋
ReclassificationActive
3 in queue
1 recommended · 1 pending eval · 1 under review
Compression Risk Summary
SupervisorSubordinateDeptGapRisk
PW SupervisorMaintenance Worker IIIPublic Works2.4%High
Police LieutenantPolice SergeantPolice3.2%High
Engineering Tech IIIEngineering Tech IIPublic Works3.2%High
Fire CaptainFire EngineerFire3.9%High
IT ManagerSr Systems AdminAdministration7.1%Moderate
Reclassification Queue
IDEmployeeCurrent → RequestedDeptScoreStatus
RC-2026-001Martinez, J.Planner II → Senior PlannerCommunity Dev340Under Review
RC-2026-002Chen, L.IT Specialist → Sr IT SpecialistInformation TechPending Eval
RC-2026-003Williams, D.Maint Worker II → Maint Worker IIIPublic Works285Recommended
🧠Governance Executive NarrativeAI-Generated

The organization's Compensation Governance Health Index stands at 38/100 (At Risk). The most recent market scan (Northeast) identified 10 classifications below competitive thresholds, with 0 within the competitive range. 4 high-risk compression instances were detected where supervisor-subordinate salary differentials fall below 5%. A targeted compression correction fund is recommended. Fiscal modeling projects a 3-year cumulative impact of $4.31M for the modeled compensation adjustment scenario. The reclassification queue contains 3 requests, of which 1 has been recommended for approval. Continuous monitoring through this platform replaces the traditional 3–5 year compensation study cycle with real-time governance intelligence.

← Suite Home

Reports & Deliverables

Generate comprehensive reports for each assessment module, production tool, and an integrated cross-module analysis.

⚡ Comprehensive Analysis Report

Integrated enterprise report combining all four assessment modules and production tool outputs into a single cross-module analysis with executive narrative, key metrics, implementation roadmap, and strategic recommendations.

Generate →
Assessment Module Reports

Organizational Effectiveness Report

OEII · 9 Domains · 27 Dimensions · Module 01

Evaluates strategic alignment, leadership governance, workforce architecture, operational systems, culture, risk management, financial accountability, digital enablement, and transformation readiness. Generates executive narrative, composite index, domain-by-domain analysis, financial exposure estimate, and phased implementation roadmap.

Generate →

HR Effectiveness Report

HROII · 6 Domains · 22 Dimensions · Module 02

Assesses compliance and regulatory posture, talent management lifecycle, classification and compensation systems, employee relations practices, benefits and leave administration, and HRIS technology maturity. Produces composite HROII index, domain strengths/gaps analysis, remediation priorities, and strategic recommendations for HR function optimization.

Generate →

Compensation Health Report

CHI · 7 Domains · 21 Dimensions · Module 03

Evaluates pay structure integrity, market competitiveness, internal equity, pay administration practices, total rewards strategy, pay-for-performance alignment, and compensation governance. Delivers CHI composite index, financial exposure assessment, domain-level findings, pay compression indicators, and a prioritized compensation remediation roadmap.

Generate →

Workforce Strategy Report

WHI · 12 Domains · 35 Dimensions · Module 04

Comprehensive workforce health assessment spanning strategic alignment, workforce planning and analytics, HR operating model, talent acquisition, performance and accountability, L&D, compensation strategy, benefits and wellbeing, leadership succession, culture and engagement, employee relations, and HR technology. Generates WHI master index with governance, operations, and transformation sub-indices, along with three-phase implementation roadmap.

Generate →
Production Tool Reports

AI Spec Writer & Classification Report

Module 05 · SPECAI · Classification Specification Analysis

Captures the AI-generated classification specification alongside the Spec Quality Index (SQI) scoring results. Includes readability analysis, equity and inclusion language audit, FLSA compliance check, plagiarism/boilerplate detection, ADA essential functions review, and structural quality assessment. Report includes the full generated spec, compliance flags, and remediation recommendations.

Generate →

MOU / CBA Compensation Analysis Report

Module 06 · MOUAI · Bargaining Agreement Analysis

Extracts and analyzes compensation provisions from Memoranda of Understanding and Collective Bargaining Agreements. Reports on base salary structures, step/grade schedules, special pay categories (bilingual, shift, hazard, certification), health and retirement benefits, leave accrual provisions, and projects three-year fiscal impact including compounding cost estimates for management review.

Generate →

Market Intelligence & Benchmarking Report

Module 07 · MIBE · Classification-Focused Analysis

Generates a focused benchmarking report for the currently selected classification in Module 07. Includes market position analysis vs anchor jurisdiction, BLS OEWS percentile distribution (10th–90th), peer jurisdiction salary comparisons across all comparators with quartile placement, regional wage differentials, and strategic positioning recommendations. Select a classification in the Market Intelligence Engine before generating.

Generate →

Compensation Governance Report

Module 08 · CGE · Continuous Compensation Analytics

Comprehensive compensation governance analysis combining job evaluation results, market monitoring alerts, compression risk findings, fiscal impact projections, and reclassification queue status. Generates AI executive narrative with recommended actions.

Generate →
← Suite Home

Study History

Track and compare analyses across engagements. Previous study snapshots are saved automatically.

Saved Studies
📋
Workforce Health — N/A
STUDY-002 · 3/16/2026 10:07 AM
65%
📋
Compensation Health — N/A
STUDY-001 · 3/16/2026 10:05 AM
59%
How Study History Works
Every time you generate a report in Module 07 (Market Intelligence) or complete an assessment (Modules 01–04), a timestamped snapshot is saved automatically. You can compare results over time to track how market position, equity gaps, and organizational health evolve between study cycles. Snapshots include position title, client name, key metrics, and the date of analysis.
← Suite Home

Client Branding

Customize report headers and exports with your client's jurisdiction name, color, and identity.

Jurisdiction Identity
Jurisdiction / Organization Name
State / Region
Primary Brand Color
Report Subtitle
Fiscal Year

Town of Maynard

Comp Audit · 2025-26 · Powered by ASCENTRA™

How Branding Works
Client branding is applied to all exported reports and the Governance Dashboard. When you generate a report or export to PDF, the report header will display the jurisdiction name and brand color you configure here, with "Powered by ASCENTRA™ · Ascension Human Capital Management" in the footer. This means your clients see their own identity on deliverables while maintaining Ascension HCM attribution.
← Suite Home

Subscription & Billing

Manage your ASCENTRA™ subscription tier · Powered by Stripe

Current Plan
Consulting Firm
Active · All assessment & production modules
Practitioner
$48,000/year
4 Assessment Modules · Up to 50 positions · PDF/Excel export
Most Popular
Consulting Firm
$85,000/year
7 Modules · Unlimited positions · Client branding · Priority support
Enterprise
$125,000/year+
All 8 Modules · Governance Engine · API access · SSO/SAML · Dedicated CSM
Security & Payment
🔒
Stripe Secure
PCI Level 1
💳
Flexible Pay
Card, ACH, Wire
📋
Annual Billing
Invoice available
🔄
Upgrade Anytime
Prorated billing
← Suite Home

Study Workspace

Multi-position dashboard — aggregate all saved M07 studies into a single engagement view for governing board delivery.

📊

No Positions in Workspace

Navigate to Module 07 · Market Intelligence Engine, complete a position analysis, and click Save Study. Saved studies appear here automatically as rows in the engagement dashboard. Each position shows its market gap, compa-ratio, range penetration, and risk classification at a glance.